en/computer/svn mergeWEBlog -- Wouter's Eclectic Bloghttps://grep.be/blog//en/computer/svn_merge/WEBlog -- Wouter's Eclectic Blogikiwiki2014-03-01T13:42:06ZRe: svn mergehttps://grep.be/blog//en/computer/svn_merge/comment_964/Sven Müller (debian@incase.de)2014-03-01T13:42:06Z2007-10-29T15:21:37Z
<p>why not this?:</p>
<pre>
svn merge -r REV:HEAD http://reposi.to.ry/svn/branches/foo .
</pre>
<p>???</p>
Re: SVN mergehttps://grep.be/blog//en/computer/svn_merge/comment_966/Jan Hudec (bulb@ucw.cz)2014-03-01T13:42:06Z2007-10-30T07:08:15Z
<p>If, in subversion, you want to merge changes, you should be using svk ;-). It can find the value of @REV for you, even when you update the branch from mainline and merge it repeatedly (which quickly becomes pain to do manually).</p>
<p>Of course truly distributed version control (git, hg, bzr) makes branches even easier to use, but if you have to work with svn, svk is really useful. Unless you want use the ability of git or bzr (don't know about hg) to branch from and merge to subversion.</p>
Re: merge trackinghttps://grep.be/blog//en/computer/svn_merge/comment_967/James (trs80@ucc.asn.au)2014-03-01T13:42:06Z2007-10-30T10:38:27Z
They're finally going to fix this in SVN 1.5: http://www.viratics.com/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.40