Yves Leterme, Belgian minister for resignation.

At least that's what it looks like right now. No less than five times did he offer his resignation as prime minister of Belgium to the king. Looks like fifth time is a charm now, too—we get to go elect a new parliament in a month or two. Sigh.

The 'fun' bit is, there's no real reason why this is necessary. The main issue that they've been talking about these past few years is the 'BHV' thing. While the issue is somewhat complex and, I'm sure, involves a huge heap of all kinds of side issues, the crux of the matter is that there's one group of politicians who wants to forbid another group of politicians from running in a region of the country around the capital.

Now I'm sure that's hugely important to politicians—after all, their career depends on it—but beyond a few fanatics in and around that very capital, I'm pretty sure nobody actually cares what the particular names are of the particular groups of people that appear on the list of people they can vote for. Because, you see, this isn't actually about politicians wanting to forbid other politicians from running; it's about politicians wanting to forbid other political parties from running. Which, of course, makes a whole world of difference. Yeah, right.

Now I wouldn't care about this much, except that it interferes with the smooth running of this country. The fact that they've come up with "problem" after "problem" related to this BHV "issue" for these past years has made it hard(er) for the government to actually to any real work. So although I hate the current situation, I'm actually quite relieved that an election is coming up. Perhaps this time we can get the fanaticals out and have a real government.

(no comments allowed on this item; please use your own blog)

On clue and opinions

How does one define one's "national identity"?

One way is to look at where a person is born. By that definion, I could be called Flemish, Belgian, or European, whatever you think about it.

Another way to look at it is how one feels about one's own identity. This, of course, is a much more accurate way to describe a person; and by that definition, I am either Belgian or European. I do not feel any affinity with much of the so-called "flemish" identity, nor do I wish to be associated with it any more than is strictly necessary. Obviously, some people feel different about that for themselves.

This I can understand.

In fact, the statement to feel more Belgian than Flemish is probably not one that is very common in this general area. I am not stupid; I know that Belgium is not a Nation (it is a state, but that is a different matter). I just do not feel a lot of warm fuzzy feelings about Flanders. Naturally, other people have other feelings about that.

This, too, I can understand.

The logical result of the above is that my personal opinions about the somewhat convoluted politics in this country are not shared by many; that when I state my opinion, I may expect opposition, or at the very least someone stating why they disagree with me.

This, of course, I can also understand.

But what I cannot understand is that every time I state my opinion, someone must come out and insult my intelligence by telling me I "do not have a clue". Please do not mistake my disagreement for misunderstanding.

Martijn asks me to "check the facts". Let's do that, shall we?

1. There's been a judgement by the constitutional court that the current situation regarding which party may run for election in the BHV region is unconstitutional.
2. One group of politicians wishes to resolve this issue by splitting the BHV region in two. That would certainly solve the issue.
3. Another group of politicians dislikes this solution. They may be willing to go along, but they want other concessions before they will do so. This is what I referred to when I said that there were "a huge heap of all kinds of side issues" in my previous post.
4. The first group does not wish to make such concessions. Some of their numbers have even stated in the press that there is no need to make them, because, given the first point, there's only one solution and that is to split.

That last point is, of course, complete and utter bullshit. It would hold merit if there was only one way to solve a constitutional crisis; but by definition, there are always at least two ways: one is to change the law to comply with the constitution, the other is to change the constitution to make the law no longer be unconstitutional. So a group that feels strongly about one of these two possible solutions should be prepared to negotiate with the other group so as to hammer out an agreement that benefits both parties. In some cases, this will mean doing things that they do not completely like; but if they're not willing to do that, at all, they have no business being politicians. For the longest time during the early negotiations, however, both parties have stubbornly refused to even acknowledge the other position, let alone talk about it.

Now, for clarity, I'm not advocating that the latter of the two options in that previous paragraph is what should happen. Frankly, I don't even care what happens, so long as they manage to resolve the issue at hand in some way. What I do care about, however, is that this country has been in a near-constant state of stalemate over these past few years for an issue that only matters to politicians; I don't care who or what a group of people in a (to me) obscure part of the country can vote for. This country needs a stable government which can act on things that actually matter. Like, say, the international economic crisis of the past two years; I think it matters much more whether the man in the street has a job than whether John Q. Politician will past these next elections.

0x20

Birthday.

Old.

Presents:

Maybe more, haven't seen any yet.

Meanwhile, at $WORK I'm fighting with a mandelbug (first definition). Sucks.

Can I have my Debian back?

So someone thought it might be a good idea to switch the default from the time-honoured Debian style ("booting foo... ok") to the RedHat style ("<left-align>booting foo... <right-align>[ok]"). I don't think the switch adds any value (it's not like it looked bad or anything in the past); in fact, I think it's a bad idea. And I even have a technical reason.

On my 26" 1920x1200 screen (when the i950 driver detects it properly and actually sets the framebuffer to that resolution), the output looks like this:

Now imagine you get to see that screen for about two to five seconds. Please tell me which two initscripts failed. And no, you cannot use a ruler. Bonus points for if you manage to do so while the text is also moving upwards, which tends to happen when systems boot.

Also note that because kernel mode-settings has become the default, a lot more people are going to be using framebuffers.

Am I the only one who thinks this is a bad idea?

Dear lazyweb,

Thanks,

Help!

Yes, there is something like an 'RFH', or 'Request For Help', in the WNPP in Debian, but I thought I'd go through this blog, first, since I believe many more people who will feel inclined to help here will read this blog.

I've been maintaining the beid packages in Debian since, eh, quite a while now; and while it's not always been the package that I have spent the most time on, it's not a package that I want to give up.

However, in recent times, I've had issues with the code. I've not really been able to get the 3.5.2 release to compile properly as a package, which means that for the moment, squeeze is still stuck with a 2.x release. This is a problem, since that old release isn't supported anymore upstream, and what's worse, it does not support newer-issued eID cards. So if your card is less than about two or three years old, you can't even use it anymore. For this reason, the beid packages really, really should be updated before squeeze releases.

I've been trying to spend some time doing so, but real life kept intervening. And I haven't even been able to start looking for the 3.5.3 code that I'd heard rumours would exist.

So, this is a request for help. If you want a more recent beid package to appear in Debian (and, by extension, Ubuntu) any time soon, and you can spare some extra time on maintaining a somewhat convoluted package, you'd be an ideal candidate for comaintainer of this package. You don't need to have any experience working on Debian, but you do need experience with build systems and Makefiles. If you don't have any experience in working on Debian, but would like to learn, this might be an interesting opportunity. If you do have experience working on Debian and are as interested as me in getting this to be up-to-date in the next Debian release, your help would be very much appreciated. Even if you only have time for a little while and would like me to take over once everything is going fine again, that's helpful.

At any rate, if you want to help, contact me at wouter@debian.org. We'll work out the specifics then.

Thanks in advance,