I know, I know, I should resist saying this. But every time I see it, I wonder why it happens, and I should just get this off my chest.
The difference between "its" and "it's" is something that many people, even native english speakers, seem to miss. Yet, it's so extremely simple that I, a non-native english speaker, have been baffled about that common mistake for as long as I can remember.
The apostrophe (') in any sentence usually means that something at the location of that apostrophe is gone out to lunch. In this particular case, it means that the " " and the "i" in the phrase "it is" were hungry. So rather than "it is", we contract that to "it's", and allow the space and the i to enjoy their meal while the apostrophe keeps their seats warm.
Practically, what that means is that every time you want to write "it's", you should consider whether you can replace it with "it is" without making the sentence sound like junk. If you can't, you probably meant to write "its" rather than "it's".
For instance, consider the following sentence:
"It's not possible to repair this car within the budget that its owner wants to pay"
It's perfectly possible to say "it is not possible" here, so we need to have the apostrophe keep a seat warm for the space and the i.
It makes no sense to say "it is owner", unless you're trying to speak a much deformed form of english, so that makes it a possessive pronoun (similar to "hers", "his", "theirs", etc) and you shouldn't use an apostrophe.
Speaking of food, it's time for lunch now.
It's =/= It is. Or not in this use anyway.
In this case the "'s" after it is indicating possessiveness - eg, 'it' - the car, possesses / has an owner.
Apstrophe are often even placed wrongly by Native english speakers. See:- http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/greengrocer's_apostrophe
The confusion arises because English seems to have a sort of genitive case, in that something belonging to a noun would be "noun's" object. E.g. if the cat belongs to John, it is John's cat. The headlight on the car is the car's headlight. Here, there is always an apostrophe between the noun and the 's', while missing out the apostrophe would indicating the plural form of the noun. Hence, by extension, people assume it's means 'belonging to it'.
That this would make it the only pronoun to follow this rule appears to be missed by these people.
@Roger, you are completely and utterly wrong.
"It's" never ever ever indicates possessiveness. See, for instance, http://www.englishgrammar.org/apostrophe/, which says the same thing as I do.
Wouter, your right in you're article. There always people with they're own mind whom will never learn
cheers, paul
These two comics make a nice reference:
I think this problem with homophones does not “also” but “mostly” affect English native speakers – and among those, people from USA more than people from AU/NZ, with people from UK being least affected (unrepresentative ’net survey).
Apparently, some regions tend to learn languages primarily phonetically. As a Central European, I’ve not even learned my own language that way (well ok, as little kid, sure, but I got spelling right immediately), let alone others, so this kind of error immediately triggers recognition.
• it’s ⇐⇒ its • waist ⇐⇒ waste • their ⇐⇒ they’re ⇐⇒ there etc. – the list is long. (Phonetic misspellings, swapping -er- and -re- in words, and misspelling Latin-borrowed words are also common.)
Maybe someone should look at this scientifically…